On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Dimitris Zervas <dzer...@dzervas.gr> wrote: >>Great work! I found a couple of bugs, but they should be easy to fix. > Add a comment to be able to track them
'm', 'n' and 'N' were not working in command mode (the Arg was 0 so it was starting a sequence). I fixed it by creating a stub m_adjective and checking for it in code. I pushed that and a couple of extra bindings. The way of chaining commands if the test pointers for n+1 match is brilliant. We need a way to execute those *after* the adjective returns so we can easily implement 'y' and 'c'. > Could I have write access to sandy? Right now I don't have write access to suckless.org either. IMO you can have it, but it's up to the suckless.org gods really. In the meantime I added you to my own bitbucket remote. >>Thanks for that. Let's try to make a decent simple vi-like editor and >>then start worrying about performance and whatnot. > I wait the day that I'll edit sandy with sandy :P That sounds like a good rule of thumb.
