Hello, FRIGN wrote: > -1) Compositor's demands: > Not everyone has a full drm-kms-setup. Hell, I don't even use evdev > on my devices (It's more secure when you strip out the Event Interface > from the Kernel).
Can you explain your thinking here on security? Is it just that less compiled code == more secure? > -2) Code-rot: > I know, there are libs, but who guarantees they're still around in a > few years _and_ compatible with the still rather "dynamic" Wayland-API? > Why not just write a Weston-plugin then? Because Weston sucks (PAM, > overengineered, too many features for dwm, ...)! Have you looked much at Weston? PAM integration is limited to 1 file & 3 functions, and could be trivially excised. > In the end, you just give up and implement it yourself, forcing you to > maintain thousands of LOC, risking bugs and wasting your time. How is this different from the tinyx project you mentioned? Ah, right, you like tinyx. yours, Bobby
