On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 13:07:34 +0100 Silvan Jegen <s.je...@gmail.com> wrote:
> st and dwm on Wayland is something I would love to see, if only to > get a glimpse of the functionality of the Wayland protocol and the > Wayland/client interactions. Hey Silvan, I am still wondering if Wayland really is the way to go, given the fact it requires a lot of dependencies for "basic" tasks (*(E)GL, dbus, PAM, DRI (mostly)) and hogs memory. Recently, I had a very interesting conversation with idunham[1], who is currently working on tinyxlib[2] and tinyxserver[3], dramatically cleaned-up versions of Xlib and Xserver linked against musl with backported security-patches. You might want to check it out after reading the forum-discussion! Cheers FRIGN [1]: <http://phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?93926-The-Tiny-X-Server-Fork-Is-Still-Being-Maintained&p=388106#post388106> [2]: <https://github.com/idunham/tinyxlib> [3]: <https://github.com/idunham/tinyxserver> -- FRIGN <d...@frign.de>
