On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 01:16:35PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > * Robert Ransom <rransom.8...@gmail.com> [2013-07-03 10:26:03 +0000]: > > On 7/3/13, Galos, David <galos...@students.rowan.edu> wrote: > > >> Added LICENSE.lpl as well and updated the license and copyright details > > >> for > > >> the md5 code. > > > > > > I am considering applying this patch. The license is why I have to take > > > time to think. I'm worried about setting a precedent which allows external > > > differently-licensed software to be swept into sbase. It is clean code, > > > which is a large part of why I am considering it. > > > > Why not use the public-domain MD5 implementation from libtomcrypt? > > > > here is a cleaned up version > > http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/crypt/crypt_md5.c > > the libtomcrypt version has gratuitous optimizations > ifdef configurations and useless failure modes
That's cool. I will spend some time today or tomorrow to re-write the code and send in patch v4. If that's fine then I can also proceed with sha1sum(1). Thanks, stateless
