* Robert Ransom <rransom.8...@gmail.com> [2013-07-03 10:26:03 +0000]: > On 7/3/13, Galos, David <galos...@students.rowan.edu> wrote: > >> Added LICENSE.lpl as well and updated the license and copyright details > >> for > >> the md5 code. > > > > I am considering applying this patch. The license is why I have to take > > time to think. I'm worried about setting a precedent which allows external > > differently-licensed software to be swept into sbase. It is clean code, > > which is a large part of why I am considering it. > > Why not use the public-domain MD5 implementation from libtomcrypt? >
here is a cleaned up version http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/src/crypt/crypt_md5.c the libtomcrypt version has gratuitous optimizations ifdef configurations and useless failure modes
