On 7/3/13, Galos, David <galos...@students.rowan.edu> wrote: >> Added LICENSE.lpl as well and updated the license and copyright details >> for >> the md5 code. > > I am considering applying this patch. The license is why I have to take > time to think. I'm worried about setting a precedent which allows external > differently-licensed software to be swept into sbase. It is clean code, > which is a large part of why I am considering it.
Why not use the public-domain MD5 implementation from libtomcrypt? Robert Ransom
