On 12 December 2011 22:35, Nick <suckless-...@njw.me.uk> wrote: > Yep. One of the disadvantages of the super-simple algorithm is that > odd HTML isn't always well handled. But that's always going to be > the case, to an extent.
Fair enough. I noticed pretty much every other readability plugin failed when encountering an unclosed <hr>. It would be really nice if every site were to use the HTML5 <article>, in which case we could just grab that and call it a day. Ahh, if only. > That'd be lovely, wouldn't it? However, it'd involve rather heavier > integration with the browser. Which is something I probably don't > have the patience for. There are probably pros and cons to that approach, too. I'm sure I'll manage to hit M-r. ;) > Yeah. They work in 7+. Mozilla changed the API for v7, and I'm too > lazy to make it work with the old one. You could probably set the > options from about:config (search for 'simplyread'). Yep, that works fine. And I use 9.0a2 most of the time, anyway. > Thanks for the feedback. Any more would be welcome. I'll probably end up using this a lot (over time my tolerance for poorly designed websites has quickly approached zero), so I'll let you know if I find any other bugs. Anyway, really nice. I love the styling, btw -- very pleasant to read. Thanks, cls
