On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:08:24AM +0100, Jens Staal wrote: > For anyone interested in playing around with compiling stuff with > bionic, I just made an AUR for it: > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=44629 > > Would be cool if it started to be used :)
Jens, excellent! I will have a look into it! Cheers, Anselm > 2010/10/13 Anselm R Garbe <garb...@gmail.com>: > > Anyone volunteering to create an mkfile for bionic, this jam looks > > like jam and should be avoided. > > I volunteer to review it and to bring it in good shape. > > > > -Anselm > > > > On 13 October 2010 14:34, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I have no idea what the jam stuff is but I found this after some googling > >> too > >> > >> https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/framework/repository/revisions/10202/entry/external/source/meterpreter/source/bionic/libc/Jamfile > >> > >> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.li...@gmail.com>: > >>> Excellent! I've been searching for something like this. I'll check it out. > >>> > >>> On 13 October 2010 08:29, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Are those issues already solved by > >>>> > >>>> http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/attachments/433/get_bionic_working.diff > >>>> > >>>> ? > >>>> > >>>> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.li...@gmail.com>: > >>>>> On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wti...@my.bcit.ca> wrote: > >>>>>>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files, > >>>>>>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android > >>>>>>> distribution > >>>>>>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to > >>>>>>>wherever its looking now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at > >>>>>> all, > >>>>>> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some > >>>>>> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack > >>>>>> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a > >>>>>> new > >>>>>> makefile. > >>>>> > >>>>> there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header > >>>>> files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been > >>>>>> mentioned > >>>>>> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post > >>>>>> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more > >>>>>> info? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For > >>>>>> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may > >>>>>> actually > >>>>>> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > >