I have no idea what the jam stuff is but I found this after some googling too
https://www.metasploit.com/redmine/projects/framework/repository/revisions/10202/entry/external/source/meterpreter/source/bionic/libc/Jamfile 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.li...@gmail.com>: > Excellent! I've been searching for something like this. I'll check it out. > > On 13 October 2010 08:29, Jens Staal <staal1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Are those issues already solved by >> >> http://www.metasploit.com/redmine/attachments/433/get_bionic_working.diff >> >> ? >> >> 2010/10/13 Corey Thomasson <cthom.li...@gmail.com>: >>> On 12 October 2010 20:58, Wolf Tivy <wti...@my.bcit.ca> wrote: >>>>>I've managed to make it compile a good chunk of the object files, >>>>>but not malloc/free so its somewhat wasted. >>>> >>>> It'll talk eventually, keep up the pressure. >>>> >>>>> When I get a chance to go at it again I believe the android distribution >>>>>has some "clean" kernel headers included. I may try to move those to >>>>>wherever its looking now. >>>> >>>> Yes it does, in fact I think it shouldn't need any system headers at all, >>>> if you point it to the paths in OVERVIEW.TXT. Is there some >>>> "include_path" environment variable you can set, or do we have to hack >>>> the jamfile? Or we could do it your way and move them. Worst case is a new >>>> makefile. >>> >>> there's a variable in the Jamfile INCLUDES_x86, the included header >>> files dont seem to do the trick though. Running into syntax errors. >>> >>>> Surely someone else must have dealt with this. Metasploit has been >>>> mentioned >>>> a few times, but I couldn't find any thing more than the blog post >>>> (issue report, whatever) that jens linked. Anyone have a link to more info? >>>> >>>> About uClibc, it's LGPL, so isn't static linking a bit marginal? For >>>> GPL-compatible stuff it's ok, but 9base is incompatible, so it may actually >>>> need to be ported to bionic. Have I got this right? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
