On 10/29/10 15:06, Jacob Todd wrote: > I've read it but don't see how it pertains to what we're talking about. > On Oct 29, 2010 7:50 AM, "finkler" <fink...@officinamentis.org> wrote: >> On 10/28/10 15:38, Jacob Todd wrote: >>> How? It's statically linked iirc against the systems libs. >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/golang-nuts/browse_thread/thread/690760527da60e57/882a60388fab96a1 >> >> > Evidently there are things I don't need in my executable, which is similar to glibc, ergo not suckless.
- Re: [dev] sta.li progress Anselm R Garbe
- Re: [dev] sta.li progress hiro
- [dev] Re: sta.li progress finkler
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jacob Todd
- [dev] Re: sta.li progress finkler
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jacob Todd
- [dev] Re: sta.li progress finkler
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jacob Todd
- [dev] Re: sta.li progress finkler
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jacob Todd
- [dev] Re: sta.li progress finkler
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jacob Todd
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress pancake
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jens Staal
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress pmarin
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress pmarin
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress hiro
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Joseph Xu
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jens Staal
- Re: [dev] Re: sta.li progress Jens Staal