On 15 April 2010 07:04, finkler <fink...@officinamentis.org> wrote: > On 04/14/10 12:23, Claudio M. Alessi wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0200, pancake wrote: >>> I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other >>> alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements >> +1 >> >> I would prefer plan 9 userland againsts OpenBSD (where possible). After all >> it's a suckless distribution and it seems that plan 9 userland sucks less >> than >> OpenBSD one. >> >> Regards, >> Claudio M. Alessi >> > This raises the question, does stali aim to be POSIX (or even X/Open) > compliant?
Well not really, all it targets is usability. android isn't POSIX compliant and is probably more wide spread now then Linux desktops... ;) Cheers, Anselm
