On 04/14/10 12:23, Claudio M. Alessi wrote: > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0200, pancake wrote: >> I wrote tac in 9base a week ago... I would really prefer 9base before other >> alternatives if we can choose. Most of them are valid replacements > +1 > > I would prefer plan 9 userland againsts OpenBSD (where possible). After all > it's a suckless distribution and it seems that plan 9 userland sucks less than > OpenBSD one. > > Regards, > Claudio M. Alessi > This raises the question, does stali aim to be POSIX (or even X/Open) compliant?
Thomas.
