On 04/10/10 17:32, markus schnalke wrote: > [2010-04-10 17:12] finkler <fink...@officinamentis.org> >> On 04/10/10 16:14, Kurt H Maier wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:13 AM, finkler <fink...@officinamentis.org> wrote: >>>> And this is what is missing in OBSD: >>>> chown >>> >>> having a hard time believing this >> >> I was kind of surprised myself, but I simply can't find it in their CVS >> tree [1]. Maybe I have overlooked something? >> >> 1: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/ > > Chown is an additional name for chmod; so is chgrp. See Makefile in: > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/bin/chmod/ > > > meillo > > Cool, thank you very much, now that I know this mechanism the result is different:
What OBSD provides: arch basename cat chgrp chmod chown chroot cksum comm cp csplit cut date dd df dirname du echo env expand expr false fmt fold groups head id install join ln logname ls md5sum mkdir mkfifo mknod mktemp mv nice nohup od paste pr printenv printf pwd readlink rm rmdir sha1sum sleep sort split stat stty su sync tail tee test touch tr true tsort tty uname unexpand uniq uptime users wc who whoami yes What is missing in OBSD: base64 chcon dir dircolors factor hostid link nl pathchk pinky ptx runcon seq shred shuf sorted sum tac timeout truncate unlink vdir This is my collection of redundancy so far: arch uname -m dir ls -C groups id -nG head sed 11q mkfifo mknod FILE q nl grep -n rmdir rm -r tac tail -r vdir ls -l whoami id -nu these either could be provided as simple scripts or not at all. And what about the missing programs? Should they be rewritten (plan9port provides some of them). regards, and once again, thank you for your time. Thomas
