cd /; tar ztf package.tar.gz | xargs rm ;) 2010/1/15 Anselm R Garbe <ans...@garbe.us>: > 2010/1/15 Jimmy Tang <jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie>: >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42:02PM +0100, pancake wrote: >>> I would prefer to drop gcc, glibc and all the shit from gnu. >>> >>> Tcc and dietlibc are usable solutions and maybe the code is not the best >>> one but at least is sane. >>> >>> Current toolchain is just to get a working version. I know that anselm >>> is really busy these days, like me.. This is the reason why some of >>> those projects are a bit stopped. >>> >> >> it would be interesting to see its outcome(s), has anyone looked at the >> packaging system for such a distribution? or will a bsd style tree of >> code/makefiles be adopted? > > There is no need for a packaging system. Updates to the core stali > parts will mainly be binary diffs for executables, so you only replace > executables and potentially config files if needed. I see this as an > advantage btw -- this also supports the way that programs can > update/install themselves more easily. > > Cheers, > Anselm > >
-- http://gnuffy.chaotika.org - Real Community Distro
