2010/1/15 Jimmy Tang <jt...@tchpc.tcd.ie>: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42:02PM +0100, pancake wrote: >> I would prefer to drop gcc, glibc and all the shit from gnu. >> >> Tcc and dietlibc are usable solutions and maybe the code is not the best >> one but at least is sane. >> >> Current toolchain is just to get a working version. I know that anselm >> is really busy these days, like me.. This is the reason why some of >> those projects are a bit stopped. >> > > it would be interesting to see its outcome(s), has anyone looked at the > packaging system for such a distribution? or will a bsd style tree of > code/makefiles be adopted?
There is no need for a packaging system. Updates to the core stali parts will mainly be binary diffs for executables, so you only replace executables and potentially config files if needed. I see this as an advantage btw -- this also supports the way that programs can update/install themselves more easily. Cheers, Anselm
