On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:42:02PM +0100, pancake wrote: > I would prefer to drop gcc, glibc and all the shit from gnu. > > Tcc and dietlibc are usable solutions and maybe the code is not the best > one but at least is sane. > > Current toolchain is just to get a working version. I know that anselm > is really busy these days, like me.. This is the reason why some of > those projects are a bit stopped. >
it would be interesting to see its outcome(s), has anyone looked at the packaging system for such a distribution? or will a bsd style tree of code/makefiles be adopted? > Is there any minimal and complete fortran implementation? > not as far as I know, I'm not aware of any minimal f77, f90 or f95 implementations. this is particularly true of f90 and f95 most of these implementations are commercial and I don't think I have seen any many free/opensource implementations worth using apart from gfortran. jimmy -- Jimmy Tang Trinity Centre for High Performance Computing, Lloyd Building, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland. http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/ | http://www.tchpc.tcd.ie/~jtang
pgpDaWv8BJv73.pgp
Description: PGP signature
