On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 4:21 PM Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 9:17 AM Daniel Sahlberg > <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Den fre 22 nov. 2024 kl 09:39 skrev Daniel Sahlberg > > <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> Den ons 20 nov. 2024 kl 18:15 skrev Daniel Sahlberg > >> <daniel.l.sahlb...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> So I'd say we have consensus on moving to the Python implementation - > >>> several +1 and no-one objecting. And since this is far from core code and > >>> it can easily be reverted I don't see a problem at all. > >> > >> > >> I've been working on this today: > > > > ... > > > > I've also update the buildbot "backport-conflicts"-job to the Python > > version, it seems to work - at least it completes successfully: > > https://ci2.apache.org/#/builders/109/builds/20609. > > > > It was this job that made me catch the backport conflict lately, but I saw > > it just because I went looking for it. > > > > We currently have jobs running on both GitHub Actions and on Buildbot. > > Neither of them is reporting to any mailing list (we have notifications@ > > that should be used for this). > > > > Should we try to get e-mail notifications working again or is there a > > better method (in particular in GHA)? Should we try to consolidate all jobs > > to GHA? > > We should get email notifications working. Is that something Infra needs to > do?
Yes, we should definitely get notifications working again. Thanks for working on this! -- Johan
