On 29.06.2015 12:20, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 28.06.2015 22:15, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: >> Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: >> >>>> It would be a nice thing to have, but I am thinking that we should first >>>> nominate this change for a backport to 1.9.x, as we are dealing with an >>>> API change. >>>> >>>> Can we do that without having a complete JavaHL wrapper for this? >>> Of course. We've never treated incomplete bindings as showstoppers. I'm half >>> done with the JavaHL change, too; will probably finish tonight. >> Thanks for confirming my thoughts. I nominated the whole group of changes >> (r1684940, r1685034, r1687769, r1687776) for a backport to /branches/1.9.x. > And I have the JavaHL bits done but now I have to leave in 10 minutes, > which isn't enough time to review and write the log message. Will commit > this evening.
r1688273; I propose we add it to the existing backport proposal. -- Brane
