Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: >> Fine, but I suspect that this fix probably isn't going to address the very >> last problem in the --keep-going code. It would be a pity to delay >> Subversion 1.9.0 because of that. > > Let's not make the perfect the enemy of the good enough; we'd never have > released 1.0 otherwise. :)
Well, I was mostly thinking about possible regressions caused by the addition of this feature — such as the svn_repos_verify_fs2() API incompatibility that we were discussing originally. Regards, Evgeny Kotkov
