On 28.06.2015 22:15, Evgeny Kotkov wrote: > Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> writes: > >>> It would be a nice thing to have, but I am thinking that we should first >>> nominate this change for a backport to 1.9.x, as we are dealing with an >>> API change. >>> >>> Can we do that without having a complete JavaHL wrapper for this? >> Of course. We've never treated incomplete bindings as showstoppers. I'm half >> done with the JavaHL change, too; will probably finish tonight. > Thanks for confirming my thoughts. I nominated the whole group of changes > (r1684940, r1685034, r1687769, r1687776) for a backport to /branches/1.9.x.
And I have the JavaHL bits done but now I have to leave in 10 minutes, which isn't enough time to review and write the log message. Will commit this evening. -- Brane
