Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 12:50:55 +0100: > On 07.01.2013 12:46, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Which points out that when we next rewrite the FS library, we should > > re-draw the link between libsvn_fs and libsvn_fs_foo > > Agreed. > > > --- in a manner that avoids us having to implement all > > these little features for each backend separately... > > ... but definitely not for this reason. I do /not/ want my abstract > interface to dictate how to, e.g., design the directory index in the > filesystem implementation.
Neither do I :) I was assuming we could provide a libsvn_fs_util helper that constructs a new dir rep; FS backends can elect to use that, or roll their own.
