Branko Čibej wrote on Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 11:27:09 +0100: > On 06.01.2013 10:43, Bert Huijben wrote: > > The revprop and revision cache are in fsfs, not the repos layer... > > > > In what way are you then comparing the backends? > > > > You are now comparing a backend+caching to a backend without caching. > > > > I’m not against dropping support, but if we do it we should do it for > > the right reasons, not by using skewed numbers. > > Caching is part of the FSFS backend. One would assume that a key-value > database like BDB would have its own cache, which is therefore > implicitly part of the BDB back-end. I don't see how you could construe > these numbers as skewed.
Just look at all the different svn_cache__t instances in FSFS. They include, for example, a cache of combined svndiff windows --- that's not something the db layer is going to have.
