On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 9:44 PM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>wrote:
> hosted elsewhere for them. The BDB backend (thanks to improvements to the > Berkeley DB library itself) is much more stable today than it was when we > first started this project, so it's quite possible that we don't hear noise > That's quite surprising. My understanding from the Sleepycat/Oracle team way back when was that our core usage of BDB was wrong and would never be properly supported by them. Have they embraced multiple reader/writer processes now, or do they still advocate that having a single-process is the only Right Way(tm)? -- justin
