On 01/04/2013 05:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 05:29:30PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> "--cl=none" -- introduces a reserved changelist name "none" that >> someone, somewhere might already be really using. > > Is this really a problem? > > We're bumping the working copy format anyway for 1.8, so the new > format could start reserving the 'none' changelist. An existing 'none' > changelist could be detected by 'svn upgrade'. It could then ask the user > to rename the changelist before upgrading, or even prompt for a new > name which makes upgrading easier if 1.7 isn't installed anymore. > > I like --cl none much better than --cl "".
Oooh... that's a sneaky idea. I rather like it! Doesn't really hope folks who have scripted processes which involve a changelist named "none", of course, but we may be well into "edge-case" territory, here. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
