C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 16:25:07 -0500: > On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > > Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100: > >> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > >>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk > >>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the > >>> --cl > >>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I > >>> know > >>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway. > >> > >> Please merge it to trunk! > >> > >> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and > >> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up. > > > > I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be > > simple to axe it from the release notes. > > Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk > behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble > really remembering the driving use-case here.
svn st -q --cl "" ?
