On 01/04/2013 04:25 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > On 01/04/2013 03:57 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Stefan Sperling wrote on Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 19:31:20 +0100: >>> On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:23:28PM -0500, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >>>> Can anyone make an argument for me *not* to reintegrate my branch to trunk >>>> for 1.8 release? I need to code up some more regression tests for the --cl >>>> "" behaviors, but I don't really want to invest that energy today if I know >>>> that dev@ is disinterested in seeing this new functionality in 1.8 anyway. >>> >>> Please merge it to trunk! >>> >>> This feature is already mentioned in the 1.8 draft release notes and >>> I'm glad to learn that you've fixed it up. >> >> I hope that's not the only reason you want to merge it --- it'd be >> simple to axe it from the release notes. > > Yeah, I was kinda hoping for a bit more justification myself. Is the trunk > behavior what we want to ship/live with? See, I'm having a bit of trouble > really remembering the driving use-case here.
Oops! Sorry -- I meant "Is the *branch* behavior..." here. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Enterprise Cloud Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
