On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
If an update pulls in a null delta --- eg, because it updates across two
revisions that revert each other --- then it should behave as though it
pulled nothing at all: output no 'U filename' lines, and print "At
revision %ld".
Right?
As a user, I want to see the 'U filename' report.
Perhaps ' filename' would be more accurate? That way the output is
still clear that "Nothing happened".
Or 'u filename' (lowercase u), for "updated but nothing really changed".
--apb (Alan Barrett)
