Alan Barrett wrote on Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 15:16:00 +0200: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> If an update pulls in a null delta --- eg, because it updates across two >> revisions that revert each other --- then it should behave as though it >> pulled nothing at all: output no 'U filename' lines, and print "At >> revision %ld". >> >> Right? > > As a user, I want to see the 'U filename' report. >
Perhaps ' filename' would be more accurate? That way the output is still clear that "Nothing happened". > However, if updating to an intermediate revision would have produced > conflicts, then updating to the final revision (which undoes the > changes) should not produce conflicts. > > --apb (Alan Barrett)
