On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 05:02:56PM +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Alan Barrett wrote on Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 15:16:00 +0200: > > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > >> If an update pulls in a null delta --- eg, because it updates across two > >> revisions that revert each other --- then it should behave as though it > >> pulled nothing at all: output no 'U filename' lines, and print "At > >> revision %ld". > >> > >> Right? > > > > As a user, I want to see the 'U filename' report. > > > > Perhaps ' filename' would be more accurate? That way the output is > still clear that "Nothing happened".
In my opinion a null delta is an edge-case not worth special-casing. I understand academic interest in the question. But I wouldn't see much point in changing the UI for this.
