On May 24, 2011 11:47 AM, "Stefan Sperling" <s...@elego.de> wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > > I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But > > I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for > > doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8, 1.7 > > servers would already be advertising the sha1 checksum that code would need. > > Sounds like an excellent plan to me, if there really is no penalty.
Agreed!
