On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: > I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But > I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for > doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8, 1.7 > servers would already be advertising the sha1 checksum that code would need.
Sounds like an excellent plan to me, if there really is no penalty.
