On 05/24/2011 11:47 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:30:39AM -0400, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> I held off on committing my RA work because there were no consumers. But >> I've still considering making the change because a) there's no penalty for >> doing so, and b) maybe if we add the requisite client-side magic in 1.8, 1.7 >> servers would already be advertising the sha1 checksum that code would need. > > Sounds like an excellent plan to me, if there really is no penalty.
I call the FS function in a way that says, "give me the SHA1 if you have it handy, but don't go calculate it if you don't." So, a little bit of FS query cost, some additional bytes on the wire, but that's about it. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
