Daniel Shahaf <d...@daniel.shahaf.name> writes:

> Noorul Islam K M wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:17:49 +0530:
>
>> Index: subversion/libsvn_client/info.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- subversion/libsvn_client/info.c  (revision 1089373)
>> +++ subversion/libsvn_client/info.c  (working copy)
>> @@ -408,13 +408,17 @@
>>  {
>>    struct found_entry_baton fe_baton;
>>    svn_error_t *err;
>> +  svn_boolean_t show_exclude = FALSE;
>>  
>>    fe_baton.changelist_hash = changelist_hash;
>>    fe_baton.receiver = receiver;
>>    fe_baton.receiver_baton = receiver_baton;
>>    fe_baton.wc_ctx = ctx->wc_ctx;
>>  
>> -  err = svn_wc__node_walk_children(ctx->wc_ctx, local_abspath, FALSE,
>> +  if (depth == SVN_DEPTH_INFINITY_OR_FILES(TRUE))
>> +    show_exclude = TRUE;
>> +  
>> +  err = svn_wc__node_walk_children(ctx->wc_ctx, local_abspath, show_exclude,
>>                                     info_found_node_callback, &fe_baton, 
>> depth,
>>                                     ctx->cancel_func, ctx->cancel_baton, 
>> pool);
>>  
>
> Suppose that A/ and 'iota' are excluded.  'svn info --depth=immediates
> wc_dir' should also show information about both A/ and 'iota', but with
> your patch applied it doesn't show information for A/.
>
> (I didn't test 'iota' and testing the equivalent --depth=files recipe.)

The requirement is to show info for excludes if '-R' is passed. Doesn't
that mean you have to use --depth=infinity?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul

Reply via email to