On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Stefan Küng <tortoise...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, tested with serf from the 0.7.x branch: memory rise is still higher than > with neon, indicating that there's still some (small) memory leak somewhere. > But checkouts and updates of even larger projects succeed without using up > all available memory as before. > To compare: checkout of the TSVN source including all externals with serf > uses up about 40MB more RAM than when using neon. I'd say that's ok.
Does the memory keep going up? Or, does it reach a steady point? I'd expect that ra_serf would use a bit more memory than ra_neon as it has to manage a lot more than what neon has to do. As a point of reference, on Mac OS X 10.6, svn 1.6.x with ra_serf checking out svn trunk peaks at 81MB, while ra_neon peaks at 12MB. HTH. -- justin
