On 01/06/2011 03:48 PM, Stefan Küng wrote: > On 06.01.2011 21:41, C. Michael Pilato wrote: >> I'm sorry if I asked this before -- I've been asking individual folks for >> over a month now, but I can't quickly find a public broadcast thread about >> it, at least -- but I've been wondering lately: >> >> What, exactly, stands in the way of us branching for 1.7 stabilization? >> >> ra_serf stabilization? No... that's fairly well taken care of, and would >> fit perfectly within in the scope of post-branch work anyway. > > At least on Windows, I doubt that ra_serf is even used right now. Because of > the huge memory leak serf has/had (See here: > http://code.google.com/p/serf/source/detail?r=1416). But even though the > leak is fixed, there hasn't been another release yet. > With the latest release without that fix, serf is not usable at all. > To get more people to test ra_serf, serf itself first needs a new release > which includes that fix. > > Stefan >
Xlnt feedback. I've noted this on our roadmap.html page. What else? -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
