On 23.01.2011 14:41, Lieven Govaerts wrote:


On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
<jus...@erenkrantz.com <mailto:jus...@erenkrantz.com>> wrote:

    On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts <svn...@mobsol.be
    <mailto:svn...@mobsol.be>> wrote:
     >> Greg or Lieven, any thoughts here?  -- justin
     >
     > At least the one rev that fixes this issue, don't know if the
    other are
     > already working in all scenario's.
     > I'll look at it this weekend and make a release.

    Woohoo.  Thanks.  I'll be sure to test it.  Let me know if you need
    any help.  -- justin


I've prepared branch 0.7.x with the changes that are safe to go in serf
0.7.1.

I'm running some tests on Linux, Windows 7 and Mac Os X. On the latter
svn trunk currently doesn't build for me (is_atomicity_error symbol not
found), but doesn't seem to be related to serf.

I'd appreciate some more testing, before I make the release later this
week. The code to get is:
http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/branches/0.7.x at r1427.

I've used a build from serf trunk for a while now without problems.
The serf log indicates that r1416 has been merged, but r1417 has not. Is there a reason why this memory leak fix hasn't been merged to 0.7.x?

Stefan

--
       ___
  oo  // \\      "De Chelonian Mobile"
 (_,\/ \_/ \     TortoiseSVN
   \ \_/_\_/>    The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
   /_/   \_\     http://tortoisesvn.net

Reply via email to