On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 7:51 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>wrote:
> Stefan Sperling wrote: > > Should we delay the #3242 fix until 1.6.12 and release 1.6.11 ASAP? > > That would give us plenty of time to do the #3242 backport properly, > > and would give users access to the other 1.6.11 backport items. > > I was actually thinking the same thing, but if 1.6.12 is going to be > another > several months out, I think our users would stone us to death in the > street. > 1.6.12 doesn't have to be another several months out. I'm ready to roll a release whenever there is critical mass in support of such. -Hyrum
