Stefan Sperling wrote: > Should we delay the #3242 fix until 1.6.12 and release 1.6.11 ASAP? > That would give us plenty of time to do the #3242 backport properly, > and would give users access to the other 1.6.11 backport items.
I was actually thinking the same thing, but if 1.6.12 is going to be another several months out, I think our users would stone us to death in the street. -- C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
