On Jan 19, 2010, at 8:06 AM, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Hyrum K. Wright > <hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote: > >> That being said, I haven't heard any complaints from current moderators >> about the >> workload, nor have I seen any ill-moderated mail come through, so I'm not >> entirely sure of >> the need for additional moderators at this point. > > Hard to know if mail is not going through though. On users@ I have > noticed times when I suddenly get 10 messages, which tells me that > someone just got around to moderating. On tigris, when we got a good > mix of moderators in different timezones, we did not see this.
I was referring to the fact that we haven't gotten spam moderated through to the list. But you're right in that this could either mean good moderation or no moderation, and we have no way of determining which. > I think the main point is that we have community members that seen to > want to help. Agreed. I'm just not sure what steps need to happen to make that reality (nor did I know on tigris, fwiw). -Hyrum
