Hi Julian, Julian Foad wrote: >>> If such shortened format were used somewhere in the log messages, it would >>> be hard to decipher it without knowing the original revision number. >> Yes this is a constraint which I thought about. Will try to make the script >> intelligent or will propose some other alternatives. > > Please can you run (a modified version of) your script that saves the > output to a text file, and post a link to that text file, so we can have > a quick scan through to look for problems like that.
You can get a sample run (20 MB) of the modified script here - http://people.apache.org/~stylesen/sample_run_r836401_r880642.txt PS: Sorry for the delayed response, since I tried this from a very poor internet connection and realized it took more than 5 days to run to completion. Then I managed to run the same script on a machine which had a larger internet pipe, which ran to completion within few minutes. -- Senthil Kumaran S http://www.stylesen.org/
