On Fri, 2009-11-27 at 18:36 +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote: > Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > > 2009/11/27 Senthil Kumaran S <sent...@collab.net>: > >> Already ran a test on r880575 and the script did what it was supposed to > >> do. > >> > > > > How about preserving the old numbers as well (e.g. in brackets)? > > > > I also see that, e.g. in > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/CHANGES > > when several revision numbers are mentioned, they are shortened, e.g. > > (r39635, -6, -7) > > > > If such shortened format were used somewhere in the log messages, it would > > be hard to decipher it without knowing the original revision number. > > Yes this is a constraint which I thought about. Will try to make the script > intelligent or will propose some other alternatives.
Please can you run (a modified version of) your script that saves the output to a text file, and post a link to that text file, so we can have a quick scan through to look for problems like that. One question that comes to mind is: does your script replace a string like "r40000" even when it occurs inside a string, such as: - See the email with MessageId: a01b23r40000xyz + See the email with MessageId: a01b23r880074xyz - Julian
