Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > 2009/11/27 Senthil Kumaran S <sent...@collab.net>: >> Already ran a test on r880575 and the script did what it was supposed to do. >> > > How about preserving the old numbers as well (e.g. in brackets)? > > I also see that, e.g. in > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/CHANGES > when several revision numbers are mentioned, they are shortened, e.g. > (r39635, -6, -7) > > If such shortened format were used somewhere in the log messages, it would > be hard to decipher it without knowing the original revision number.
Yes this is a constraint which I thought about. Will try to make the script intelligent or will propose some other alternatives. -- Senthil Kumaran S http://www.stylesen.org/
