+1 (Binding) * Built from source * Verified checksums [1] * Validated Signature * NOTICE & DISCLAIMER file exists * Verified Incuabting in name * Verified source files have apache header * Verified no code diff b/w git tag & src tar [2] * Skimmed over the published jars
Thanx Richard for driving the release. Good Luck!!! -Ayush [1] The checksum matches but shasum fails, curious like how do we generate the checksum here: ``` ayushsaxena@ayushsaxena 3.1.0-rc1 % shasum -c -a 512 *.sha512 shasum: apache-stormcrawler-3.1.0-incubating-source-release.tar.gz.sha512: no properly formatted SHA checksum lines found ``` [2] I saw a directory in the src tar ``` apache-stormcrawler-3.1.0-incubating/core/src/test/resources/__files ``` It is there in src tar but not in git tag ``` drwxr-xr-x 2 ayushsaxena staff 64 Jul 5 00:22 __files ``` It seems like an empty directory not a binary, so I don't think it is problematic, but still why it is there only in src tar On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 22:33, PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > > +1 fanningpj (IPMC and PPMC) > > * Checked the file names and that downloads work > * asc and sha512 are valid > * can compile from source > * source headers ok > * only binaries seem to be used for test case inputs > * nexus published jars look ok > > Some nits that I have raised as issues in the issue tracker. > > On 2024/09/13 13:40:18 Julien Nioche wrote: > > Thanks Richard > > > > Followed the checklist and ran a crawl with the RC, all good! > > > > +1 jnioche (PPMC) > > > > On Fri, 13 Sept 2024 at 10:49, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache StormCrawler > > > (Incubating) [version] release and it is ready for testing. > > > > > > This is the 2nd release under the ASF umbrella. Notably, it contains the > > > new playwright module, which can be used for > > > dynamic scraping. > > > > > > Thank you to everyone who contributed to this release, including all of > > > our users and the people who submitted bug reports, > > > contributed code or documentation enhancements. > > > > > > The release was made using the Apache StormCrawler (Incubating) release > > > process, documented here: > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/blob/main/RELEASING.md > > > > > > Source: > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/stormcrawler/3.1.0-rc1/ > > > > > > Tag: > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.1.0 > > > > > > Commit Hash: > > > > > > 95f80689e029a8c63a7cbf8e2a831c412250f245 > > > > > > Maven Repo: > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1002 > > > > > > <repositories> > > > <repository> > > > <id>stormcrawler-3.1.0-rc1</id> > > > <name>Testing StormCrawler 3.1.0 release candidate</name> > > > <url> > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestormcrawler-1002 > > > </url> > > > </repository> > > > </repositories> > > > > > > Preview of website: > > > > > > https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/download/index.html > > > > > > Release notes: > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-stormcrawler/releases/tag/stormcrawler-3.1.0 > > > > > > Reminder: The up-2-date KEYS file for signature verification can be > > > found here: https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/stormcrawler/KEYS > > > > > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache StormCrawler (Incubator) > > > 3.1.0 > > > The vote is open for at least the next 72 hours. > > > > > > Only votes from IPMC are binding, but everyone is welcome to check the > > > release candidate and vote. > > > The vote passes if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. > > > > > > Please VOTE > > > > > > [+1] go ship it > > > [+0] meh, don't care > > > [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper} > > > > > > Please include your checklist in your vote: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/Incubator+Release+Checklist > > > > > > Note: After this VOTE passes on our dev@ list, the VOTE will be brought > > > to general@ in order to get the necessary IPMC votes. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Richard > >
