Pretty much anything (say vs current timestamp operations in Spark). On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 2:51 PM serge rielau.com <se...@rielau.com> wrote:
> What are you comparing performance against? > On Mar 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM -0700, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.INVALID>, > wrote: > > Any thoughts on how to deal with performance here? Initially we didn't do > nano level precision because of performance (would not be able to fit > everything into a 64 bit int). > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sakthi <sak...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:32 AM Zhou Jiang <zhou.c.ji...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 for the nanosecond support >>> >>> >>> > On Mar 16, 2025, at 16:03, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > >>> > +1 for supporting NanoSecond Timestamps. >>> > >>> > Thank you, Qi. >>> > >>> > Dongjoon. >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> > >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >>> >>>
