What are you comparing performance against? On Mar 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM -0700, Reynold Xin <r...@databricks.com.INVALID>, wrote: Any thoughts on how to deal with performance here? Initially we didn't do nano level precision because of performance (would not be able to fit everything into a 64 bit int).
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sakthi <sak...@apache.org<mailto:sak...@apache.org>> wrote: +1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:32 AM Zhou Jiang <zhou.c.ji...@gmail.com<mailto:zhou.c.ji...@gmail.com>> wrote: +1 for the nanosecond support > On Mar 16, 2025, at 16:03, Dongjoon Hyun > <dongj...@apache.org<mailto:dongj...@apache.org>> wrote: > > +1 for supporting NanoSecond Timestamps. > > Thank you, Qi. > > Dongjoon. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe e-mail: > dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org<mailto:dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org>
