Any thoughts on how to deal with performance here? Initially we didn't do nano level precision because of performance (would not be able to fit everything into a 64 bit int).
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:34 AM Sakthi <sak...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:32 AM Zhou Jiang <zhou.c.ji...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 for the nanosecond support >> >> >> > On Mar 16, 2025, at 16:03, Dongjoon Hyun <dongj...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > +1 for supporting NanoSecond Timestamps. >> > >> > Thank you, Qi. >> > >> > Dongjoon. >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org >> >>
