Hey all,

@Jakob, yeah I was thinking we'll follow our normal flow. RTC. I just
wanted to set expectation that the code committed might be not up to our
normal quality initially (missing docs, no tests, etc). Until the quality
is raised, we should think of this module as experimental.

@Milinda, awesome! Thanks. :)

Cheers,
Chris

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Milinda Pathirage <mpath...@umail.iu.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> Hope we no longer need the SQL API. I'll create a RB for Calcite
> integration.
>
> Thanks
> Milinda
>
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I think so. There was some RB downtime, but it just got fixed. Yi,
> Navina,
> > Milinda, can you make sure your JIRAs have up to date RBs?
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, sriram <sriram....@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Can we have updated RBs for all the three sub tasks before we commit?
> > This
> > > would help us to review even after we commit.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chris Riccomini <
> criccom...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > Yi, Navina, and Milinda have been working on SAMZA-390 sub-tickets
> > > related
> > > > to SQL operators. We're getting to the point where the amount of work
> > > > floating around is quite large, and some tickets build off of others.
> > > >
> > > > I'm proposing that we commit this work into a samza-sql submodule on
> > > > master, and treat this module as experimental. I want to avoid
> > branches,
> > > > and I also want to avoid revision control over JIRA. This means that
> > > there
> > > > will probably be a fair amount of commits/JIRAs on this module as we
> > > > iterate, but I think that's OK.
> > > >
> > > > Does this sound good to everyone?
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Chris
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Milinda Pathirage
>
> PhD Student | Research Assistant
> School of Informatics and Computing | Data to Insight Center
> Indiana University
>
> twitter: milindalakmal
> skype: milinda.pathirage
> blog: http://milinda.pathirage.org
>

Reply via email to