Hi, Jacob, Yes, for sure.
-Yi On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Jakob Homan <jgho...@gmail.com> wrote: > This submodule will still be under the review-then-commit (RTC) > regime, correct? > > On 4 February 2015 at 11:13, Yi Pan <nickpa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just did the update w/ SAMZA-482. > > > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> I think so. There was some RB downtime, but it just got fixed. Yi, > Navina, > >> Milinda, can you make sure your JIRAs have up to date RBs? > >> > >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, sriram <sriram....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Can we have updated RBs for all the three sub tasks before we commit? > >> This > >> > would help us to review even after we commit. > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chris Riccomini < > criccom...@apache.org> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hey all, > >> > > > >> > > Yi, Navina, and Milinda have been working on SAMZA-390 sub-tickets > >> > related > >> > > to SQL operators. We're getting to the point where the amount of > work > >> > > floating around is quite large, and some tickets build off of > others. > >> > > > >> > > I'm proposing that we commit this work into a samza-sql submodule on > >> > > master, and treat this module as experimental. I want to avoid > >> branches, > >> > > and I also want to avoid revision control over JIRA. This means that > >> > there > >> > > will probably be a fair amount of commits/JIRAs on this module as we > >> > > iterate, but I think that's OK. > >> > > > >> > > Does this sound good to everyone? > >> > > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > Chris > >> > > > >> > > >> >
