I think so. There was some RB downtime, but it just got fixed. Yi, Navina, Milinda, can you make sure your JIRAs have up to date RBs?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:24 AM, sriram <sriram....@gmail.com> wrote: > Can we have updated RBs for all the three sub tasks before we commit? This > would help us to review even after we commit. > > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Chris Riccomini <criccom...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > Yi, Navina, and Milinda have been working on SAMZA-390 sub-tickets > related > > to SQL operators. We're getting to the point where the amount of work > > floating around is quite large, and some tickets build off of others. > > > > I'm proposing that we commit this work into a samza-sql submodule on > > master, and treat this module as experimental. I want to avoid branches, > > and I also want to avoid revision control over JIRA. This means that > there > > will probably be a fair amount of commits/JIRAs on this module as we > > iterate, but I think that's OK. > > > > Does this sound good to everyone? > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > >
