+1 (binding) Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2022, at 2:38 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +100 to this ! > > Thanks for this proposal > > Enrico > >> Il giorno lun 26 set 2022 alle ore 10:04 Zike Yang <z...@apache.org> ha >> scritto: >> >> +1. Looks good to me. >> >> Do we need to move the `Apache Pulsar / Multi Clients` Github project >> to the corresponding repos? >> >> Thanks, >> Zike Yang >> >> Zike Yang >> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 7:22 AM Matteo Merli <matteo.me...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> -- >>> Matteo Merli >>> <matteo.me...@gmail.com> >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 8:14 PM Michael Marshall <mmarsh...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Great proposal, thanks Matteo. >>>> >>>> I think I agree with splitting out the client into two repos. One >>>> issue is that new C++ features will lag in the python client because >>>> the C++ client will first need to be released. Quick releases will >>>> likely help there. >>> >>> Yes, decoupling Java, C++ and Python releases will make each of them >>> much easier. >>> >>> We'll be able to do patch releases with a tenth of the manual work involved. >>> >>>>> The client <--> broker compatibility is in general always guaranteed. >>>> >>>> I think we should make this more visible in our Pulsar documentation. >>>> It's a fantastic feature, and I get the sense that it is not well >>>> known. >>> >>> Agree, it's something that still surprises a lot of people.
